Look at the following blogs (specifically the evaluations) for some guidance/ideas...
BLOG 1: Evaluation - 16/20
Examiner's Comments: A clear attempt to respond in detail to the seven stipulated questions. Some range of technology used, though at times it reads like an essay response. Overall, clearly enough evidence to warrant the bottom end of the level 4 but much more room to develop the combination of digital technology alongside critical evaluation.
BLOG 2: Evaluation - 12/20
Examiner's Comments: This evaluation suffers from a failure to complete with question 7 being missed out. However, those questions which are addressed have been done to a good level of detail with an attempt to employ a range of technology amongst the blog posts. There is enough evidence to warrant this mark although more emphasis on analysis and creative digital technology outside of the blog would enhance the mark.
BLOG 3: Evaluation - 14/20
Examiner's Comments: This evaluation is sufficiently detailed, but can slip into chatty evaluative comment as opposed to critical and analytical. However, there is an attempt to employ a range of digital technologies. Some questions are more detailed than others with a tendency to rely on PowerPoint to present ideas which then come across as basic. Overall, there is some slight generosity in the application of the mark scheme here.
No comments:
Post a Comment